Wolf v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Dissent
LUMPKIN, J.,
dissent.
1 1 With all due respect, I am compelled to dissent to this Opinion. The opinion needlessly determines that the Oklahoma Methamphetamine Offender Registry Act is unconstitutional when Petitioner had sufficient notice in the first instance.
T2 First and foremost, Petitioner waived appellate review of this issue by failing to properly set it out in her motion to withdraw plea. This Court's rule on this matter is clear: "[nlo matter may be raised in the petition for a writ of certiorari unless the same has been raised in the application to withdraw the plea." Rule 4.2(B),…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Gebser v. Lago Vista Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Liparota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lambert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Bryan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.