Legal Opinion · Dissent

Wolf v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided November 28, 2012No. C-2011-1035Published

1Dissent

LUMPKIN, J.,

dissent.

1 1 With all due respect, I am compelled to dissent to this Opinion. The opinion needlessly determines that the Oklahoma Methamphetamine Offender Registry Act is unconstitutional when Petitioner had sufficient notice in the first instance.

T2 First and foremost, Petitioner waived appellate review of this issue by failing to properly set it out in her motion to withdraw plea. This Court's rule on this matter is clear: "[nlo matter may be raised in the petition for a writ of certiorari unless the same has been raised in the application to withdraw the plea." Rule 4.2(B),…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Gebser v. Lago Vista Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Liparota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Lambert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Bryan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API