Legal Opinion

United States v. Michael E. Gaudin

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 18, 1993No. 90-30334PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUG, Circuit Judge:

This case involves an alleged scheme in which Gaudin purchased houses, then entered into sham sales transactions at inflated appraised prices, obtained loans on the basis of the inflated prices, reacquired the property, rented it, failed to make the mortgage payments, and applied the rents to his own use. He was convicted of equity skimming, a violation of 12 U.S.C. § 1709-2, for his failure to pay the HUD/FHA insured mortgages while retaining the rents on the secured properties and applying them to his own use. He was also convicted of 43 counts of violations of 18 U.S.C.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Yates v. EvattSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Carella v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James E. KESSI, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. United States v. Hien Hai Hoac, United States of America v. Hgai Choy ChanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  3. United States v. Patricia S. CaldwellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. Michael E. GaudinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. Eduardo PerezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API