Legal Opinion

Howard v. Claudy

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 19, 1954No. Appeal, No. 143PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Woodside, J.,

On September 21, 1951, relator filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in which he alleged, among other things, that he was not present when the jury returned its verdict. After hearing, the court below, on December 21, 1951, dismissed the petition. On appeal, this court affirmed the court below except as to the finding that relator was present when the verdict was *3returned. Since the minutes of the original trial in the Court of Oyer and Terminer of Allegheny County at No. 77 February Sessions, 1939, affirmatively showed relator was present during the trial but did…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Nanty-Glo Boro. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Hawk v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Marelia v. BurkeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Uhler v. BurkeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  5. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Darcy v. ClaudySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. Philip J. Howell, A/K/A James Colburne HowardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Goodfellow v. RundleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  3. Commonwealth ex rel. Richter v. BurkeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  4. Commonwealth ex rel. DeSimone v. MaroneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Commonwealth Ex Rel. DeSimone v. CavellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API