Chad William Murray v. State

OPINION

BRIAN QUINN, Chief Justice.

Chad William Murray appeals his conviction for driving while intoxicated. He raises four issues, but we address only one for it is dispositive. 1 That issue involves the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction. We find the evidence legally insufficient, reverse the judgment, and render judgment of acquittal.

The pertinent standard of review was most recently explained in Carrizales v. State, 414 S.W.3d 737 (Tex.Crim.App.2013). It requires the court to view the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict and determine whether any rational…