Legal Opinion

Lehlbach v. Haynes

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 15, 1891PublishedCited by 18 opinions

On question certified from the Essex Circuit Court. Argued at November Term, 1891, before Justices Dixon and Reed.

1Opinion of the Court

*78The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dixon, J.

On October 31st, 1891, Herman Lehlbach presented to the Circuit Court of Essex county a petition, •under sections 100-115 of “An act to regulate, elections,” approved April 18th, 1876 (Rev., p. 355), to contest the election of Joseph E. Haynes as mayor of the city of Newark, at the charter election held October 13th, 1891; and thereupon the Circuit Court referred to this court the question whether such petition should be dismissed, on the ground that it does not state a case within the statute.

The statute, provides that the election of any…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Roche v. BruggemannSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1890

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Wilkinson v. McGillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
  2. Hale v. StimsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  3. Tazwell v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Vargas v. CalabreseDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1986
  5. Application of James T. MurphyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API