Legal Opinion

Fox v. Kingsland

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided December 14, 1948No. 2877-47PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAMM, District Judge.

This is an action brought by a former employe of the Patent Office to compel the Commissioner of Patents to reinstate in the files of the Patent Office the plaintiff’s application for a patent upon an invention in the field of radiant energy. The plaintiff asks for additional relief in the form of authorization to the Commissioner of Patents to issue a patent to the plaintiff and -to find that the plaintiff is not barred from obtaining a patent on the aforesaid application, or any of its claims, by reason of the fact that the invention, upon which the application was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Dubilier Condenser CorpSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. King v. YoungCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938
  3. Page v. Holmes Burglar Alarm Telegraph Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1880

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Livia C. Schmierer and Jacques H. F. Valin v. John C. NewtonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
  2. Marzall, Commissioner of Patents v. Fox. Fox v. Marzall, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API