Young v. Cistac
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the CourtLand, J.
Plaintiffs, Henry M. Young and Claude G. Rives, Jr., have brought the present suit to compel the defendant to perform specifically an alleged promise to sell certain lots in the city of New Orleans, by signing a notarial act transferring said property to them, npon payment to defendant of the price fixed in said contract. Defendant pleaded an exception of no cause of action before answer filed, and renewed said plea in his answer. The trial judge rendered a judgment in the case upon the merits in favor of defendant, dismissing plaintiffs’ suit, at their cost.
1. The contract in question was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hennessy v. WoolworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Denny v. BennettSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Anderson v. AthertonSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- City of New Orleans v. New Orleans & Northeastern RailroadSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1892
- Whitaker v. NewburgerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
3Cited by14 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Bond v. Register of ConveyancesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
- McMikle v. O'NEALLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
- Belaire v. ElderLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1950
- HERLITZ CONST. CO., INC. v. MatherneLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
- Harrison v. SmithLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.