Weyman v. National Broadway Bank
The Superior Court of New York City
Motion that the opinion of the late chief judge Curtis, filed June 7, 1880, may stand as the findings of fact and conclusions of law, and that judgment be entered thereon.
1Opinion of the Court
Russell, J.—
This action was tried before the late chief justice Curtis, without a jury, on the 15th day of March, 1880. On the seventh day of June, judge Curtis handed down an opinion, in which, after reciting the history of the controversy and discussing the law applicable to the questions at issue, he says: “ The plaintiff is entitled to a judgment for the value of the property claimed. The evidence varies very much as to the value of this property. Giving it such consideration as I have been able to, from the proofs submitted, I find the value of the furniture claimed by the plaintiff, and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Thomas v. TannerNew York Supreme Court · 1856
- Putnam v. CrombieNew York Supreme Court · 1861
- Chamberlain v. DempseyThe Superior Court of New York City · 1862
- Porter v. ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
- Rogers v. BeardNew York Supreme Court · 1860
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dawson v. Wright, Mayor, Etc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1955
- State Ex Rel. Harp v. Vanderburgh Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1949
- Wainwright v. P. H. & F. M. Roots Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1912
- Company A, First Regiment North Dakota National Guard Training School v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
- Crane v. First National Bank of McHenryNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.