Wonderly v. Tax Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.
The original action herein was a proceeding in the probate court to determine the inheritance tax due in the estate of Francis B. King-seed. An examination of the will creating the estates discloses that, upon the death of the testator, his son and heir, Wilbur Francis Kingseed, became seized o.f an estate in fee, subject to be divested should the said Wilbur Francis Kingseed “die before arriving at the age of 25 without leaving heirs of his body,’’ upon the happening of which contingency the estate would vest in the brothers and sisters of the testator; in other words, there was created a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Tax Commission v. OswaldOhio Supreme Court · 1923
- In Re the Transfer Tax Upon the Estate of ParkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- In Re the Transfer Tax Upon the Estate of ZborowskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
- In Re the Transfer Tax Upon the Estate of WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- People v. ByrdIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re Estate of FriedmanOhio Supreme Court · 1950
- Tax Commission v. Commerce Guardian Trust & Savings BankOhio Court of Appeals · 1926
- Estate of KruseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Gregg v. Department of TaxationOhio Court of Appeals · 1960
- Flournoy v. Security Pacific National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.