In re Kerr
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
PATTERSON, District Judge.
The trustee brought a summary proceeding for permission to sell a tapestry as part of the bankrupt estate and for an adjudication that the respondent had no interest in the tapestry. The respondent objected to the jurisdiction of the bankruptcy court to entertain a summary proceeding. After taking proof, the referee held that there was no jurisdiction, and dismissed the proceeding.
At the time of bankruptcy, the tapestry was in possession of one Sabbagh to whom it had been consigned by the bankrupt for sale. *899The trustee brought a summary proceeding against Sabbagh to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Taubel-Scott-Kitzmiller Co. v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Murphy v. John Hofman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Whitney v. WenmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- In re Walsh Bros.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1908
- Johnston v. SpencerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re I. Shainin & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1934
- In re Jaybar Realty Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1942