Legal Opinion
Gonzalez v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 21, 2003PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bruno, J.), dated March 25, 2002, as granted the separate motions of the defendants City of New York and New York City Transit Authority for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.
Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by (1) deleting the provision thereof granting those branches of the motions which were for summary judgment dismissing the cause of action pursuant to Labor Law § 241…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ross v. Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Rocovich v. Consolidated Edison Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Sprague v. Peckham Materials Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Seaman v. A.B. Chance Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Brasch v. Yonkers Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
3Cited by4 opinions
- Linares v. United Management Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Martinez v. Hitachi Construction Machinery Co.New York Supreme Court · 2006
- Opalinski v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Opalinski v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013