Carlisle v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
KHOUZAM, Judge.
John Matthew Carlisle timely appeals his conviction and sentence for burglary of an unoccupied dwelling, providing false information on a pawnbroker form, and grand theft. Because comments on Car-lisle’s post-arrest, pr e-Miranda 1 right to remain silent were improperly admitted at trial, we reverse and remand for a new trial.
The record shows that a home was burglarized on January 8, 2013. A PlayStation console and controllers were among the items stolen. The PlayStation equipment, identified by serial number, was later found at a pawn shop. The pawn shop’s records revealed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. HogginsSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
- Janiga v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Ash v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- Mack v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
3Cited by2 opinions
- Vernon Bernard Moss v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- Roundtree v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017