Legal Opinion

Dodson v. Taylor

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 15, 1890PublishedCited by 6 opinions

On error to the Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dixon, J.

To a declaration against the heirs and devisees of James Taylor, deceased, the defendants demurred, on two grounds—-first, because the declaration contains no averment of the want of sufficient personal property to pay the claim; and, second, because it seeks to charge the defendants upon an endorsement by their ancestor of a promissory note which had not matured at the time of his death, the defendants insisting that such a contingent liability is not enforceable against heirs or devisees.

The Supreme Court having given judgment for the…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ochoa v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  2. Severs v. DodsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1895
  3. Mott v. Newark German HospitalNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1897
  4. McCarthy v. MullenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911
  5. Ochoa v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API