Dodson v. Taylor
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On error to the Supreme Court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Dixon, J.
To a declaration against the heirs and devisees of James Taylor, deceased, the defendants demurred, on two grounds—-first, because the declaration contains no averment of the want of sufficient personal property to pay the claim; and, second, because it seeks to charge the defendants upon an endorsement by their ancestor of a promissory note which had not matured at the time of his death, the defendants insisting that such a contingent liability is not enforceable against heirs or devisees.
The Supreme Court having given judgment for the…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Ochoa v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Severs v. DodsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1895
- Mott v. Newark German HospitalNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1897
- McCarthy v. MullenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911
- Ochoa v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.