Legal Opinion

In re the Final Accounting of Blair

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1904PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by Josephine H. Dunning from so much of a decree of the Surrogate’s Court of the county of Chenango, entered in said Surrogate’s Court on the 31st day of March, 1902, as adjudges a certain note for $2,275 held by Louis P. Blair to be a legal and valid claim against the estate of Phebe A. Hiller, deceased.

1Opinion of the Court

Chester, J.:

Upon the final settlement of his accounts the administrator presented a personal claim against the estate of his decedent, Phebe A. Hiller, for a considerable amount for professional services as a physician rendered to her, and also for the amount of several promissory notes, claimed by him to have been made by her and delivered to him. Josephine H. Dunning, sister of the decedent, and her sole next of kin, filed objections to the account. The learned surrogate has decided in favor of the claimant upon his claim for professional services and upon all the notes, and from a part of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Clift v. . MosesNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Richardson v. . EmmettNew York Court of Appeals · 1902

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Endervelt v. SladeNew York Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Fisk v. HoldingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  3. In re the Accounting of TigheAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
  4. Moore v. DennisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
  5. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API