Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ware v. Green

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 17, 1985No. 84-262Published

1DissentSteele Hays, Justice

I have no problem with the general rule expressed by the majority, which permits a sale by a life tenant without prior approval by a court, where the language of the will makes it clear the testator intended that result. I submit, however, the rule is misapplied here, as both the four corners of the will and the circumstances of the case suggest the testator did not intend an unlimited power to be exercised at the discretion of the appellant. The Chancellor was entirely correct and I would affirm the decree.

Rules of construction of wills are used to determine the intent of the testator in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Minot v. PrescottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1782
  2. Armstrong v. ButlerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  3. Bussone v. MarshOregon Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API