Legal Opinion

State v. Staber

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1910Published

Appeal from District Court, Richland county; Honorable Frmlc P. Allen, J". Action by The State of North Dakota against Andrew Staber. Erom an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCarmody, J.

The defendant was informed against jointly with one Leonard Staber for keeping and maintaining a common nuisance in violation of the prohibition law, on certain premises in the village ■of East Wyndmere, in Richland county, on the first day of July, 1909, and thence continuously from day to day until the 18th day of August, 1909. He demanded and procured a separate trial, which resulted in his conviction. In due time a motion for a new trial was made, and *546denied. From the order denying the motion for a new trial, defendant appeals to this court.

On the trial Frank Beaver testified that he…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. The People v. . GonzalezNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  2. State v. ChaseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
  3. State v. DahlquistNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API