Legal Opinion

Loveless v. Ransom

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 25, 1901No. 639PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Petition for Rehearing.

1Opinion of the Court

JENKINS, Circuit Judge.

The statement of the facts embodied in the opinion (Loveless v. Ransom [C. C. A.] 107 Fed. 626) declares that the record does not show the bond filed March 16, 1899, to have been approved by the court, except by the order of September 2,1899, allowing the writ of error, which was at a subsequent term. This statement of fact is challenged by the petition for rehearing. The statement of fact was correct, as disclosed by the printed record. It now appears by concession of counsel that there was attached to and filed with the bond an affidavit of jurisdiction by one of the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Draper v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Sage v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Bondurant v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  4. Davidson v. LanierSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  5. Edmonson v. BloomshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1869

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chamberlain Transportation Co. v. South Pier Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1903
  2. Weinstein v. Black Diamond SS CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
  3. Rogers v. WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API