Legal Opinion

Geary v. Stafford

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 2, 1929No. Docket No. 5862PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

The plaintiff commenced an action against the defendant to recover the possession of an automobile. The defendant appeared and answered and filed a cross-complaint. In the cross-complaint he set up his claim for making repairs on the automobile and claimed a lien for repairs made. He named as cross-defendants M. E. Geary, G. B. Skinner, Max Arnold and. Richard Roe. The cross-complaint was answered by all of the defendants as so named by G. C. Ringole as their attorney. A trial was had in the lower court before the court sitting without a jury and the court made findings in favor of the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brown v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  2. Stafford v. GearyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API