Legal Opinion

Samuel E. Radnitz, Jr., and Hattie Radnitz v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided September 22, 1961No. 310, Docket 26743PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

In a suit to recover taxes paid under protest, taxpayers appeal from a judgment of the District Court denying their motion for summary judgment and granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The claim arises by virtue of the treatment by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue as dividend income rather than capital gain of certain amounts received by taxpayers upon a transfer of stock. Taxpayers owned 30% of the outstanding shares of Turner Hall Corporation (a New York corporation), which in turn owned 100% of Tylon Products, Inc. Taxpayers also owned 15 of the 100 outstanding shares of…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Thomas Kerr and Barbara Kerr v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  2. Rose Ann Coates Trust, Appellants-Petitioners v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Appellee-RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  3. United States v. R. Perry Collins, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1962
  4. Haserot v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1964
  5. Bhada v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API