Goldstein v. Aronson
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Chidsey,
H. Goldstein, appellee, instituted this action to recover a balance due for labor and materials furnished by him in the performance of a written contract entered into on April 22, 1946 with Milton H. Aronson, appellant, for the interior alteration of the latter’s property in the City of Pittsburgh. Appellant filed an answer denying that any balance was due appellee and setting up a counter-claim. Appellee filed a reply disputing the counter-claim. A jury resolved the issues against appellant and returned a verdict in favor of appellee. This appeal is from the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ellsworth v. LauthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Spitzer v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
3Cited by5 opinions
- Burch v. Reading CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
- Salsgiver Communications, Inc. v. Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Wilf v. Philadelphia Modeling & Charm School, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Lewis v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Wagman v. Paradise Mutual Fire Insurance, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, York County1951