Tucker v. Ives
New York Supreme Court
Ou motion, by the defendant, to set aside the report of referees, which was in favor of the plaintiff. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Curia, per
Sutherland, J.
The application is founded principally upon the allegation, that the whole of the plaintifF’s demand, amounting to between seven and eight hundred dollars, was barred by the statute of limitations; and ought not to have been allowed by the referees.
That demand originated as follows : On the lliAday of February, 1809, the defendant, Ives, sold and transferred to the plaintiff, a note made by one George Stowbridge to one Oliver Tuttle, for $291. Ives, at the same time, agreed to be responsible to Tucker for the amount of the note, if Stowbridge, the maker, should fail to…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Green v. . DisbrowNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Shaw v. OakeySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1842
- Ross v. RossNew York Supreme Court · 1875