Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Cooper v. Singer

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 30, 1982No. Nos. 81-2016, 81-2113Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partHolloway, Circuit Judge

I agree with the court that the appeal from the order denying attorney’s fees is properly before us. I also agree that a contingent fee agreement does not bar recovery of attorney’s fees under § 1988. For reasons that follow, I am unable to accept the rule laid down that a fee agreed on in a private agreement with counsel constitutes the maximum allowable fee.

The statute and its history do not call for such a general limitation. While the court’s concern with windfalls is proper, the statutory command is plain: the standard of a “reasonable attorney’s fee” is the measure in determining a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Daily v. ZurcherDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1974
  2. Copper Liquor, Inc. v. Adolph Coors Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  3. Gurule v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  4. International Travel Arrangers, Inc. v. Western Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  5. Ruth M. Sargeant v. Alexander E. Sharp, IICourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API