Bailey v. Dobbs
Supreme Court of Georgia
1DissentFelton, Justice
As the majority opinion, points out, there is no cross appeal from the order denying the defendants’ motion to dismiss. As a result of this', the law of the case is thereby established that the complaint stated a claim. See Rahal v. Titus, 110 Ga. App. 122 (138 SE2d 68); Cromer v. Cromer, 222 Ga. 365, 367 (149 SE2d 804); Code Ann. §81A-160 (h) (Ga. L. 1966, pp. 609, 662; Ga. L. 1967, pp. 226, 239, 240); United States *841v. American Radiator &c. Corp., (DC-Minn.), 115 FSupp. 422.
The majority opinion also notes, again without giving effect to, the following provision in Section 30-B of the city’s…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- McCutcheon v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
- Patten v. MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- State ex rel. Waring v. Georgia Medical SocietySupreme Court of Georgia · 1869
- Talmadge v. CordellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
- Georgia Railway & Power Co. v. Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.