Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Chochrek v. Cupp

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 13, 1975No. 86609Published

1Concurrence

THORNTON, J.,

specially concurring.

I concur with the majority opinion on the first two issues. However, in my view the trial court did not err in assuming jurisdiction on the third issue, namely, petitioner’s claim that he was not given a constitutionally adequate hearing when the Corrections Division terminated petitioner’s participation in the school release program.

The majority opinion states that the Corrections Division’s action in terminating petitioner’s school release and ordering him back to the penitentiary was an interinstitutional transfer mentioned in ORS 421.195,① and that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Kneefe v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  4. Paola v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  5. State v. WolfeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API