Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Southern Pac. R. v. Ambler Grain & Milling Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 27, 1933No. 6953Published

1ConcurrenceWilbur, Circuit Judge

I concur in the judgment of affirmance. I am not prepared to concur in the conclusion that lands in the right of way grant made by section 2 of the Act of 3866 quoted in the main opinion are reserved from the grant, as is the case of lands granted by section 3 of the act where such lands have been properly entered as a homestead. There seems to bo no direct decision upon that question, and appellant confesses that it has been unable to find one. There are many reasons for holding that the interest of the United States therein was granted in praesenti by the right of way grant. If it is held…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Leavenworth, Lawrence, & Galveston Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. United States v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. Kansas Pacific Railway Co. v. DunmeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Railroad Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  5. Bardon v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API