Legal Opinion

Murry v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 9, 1904No. 2973PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Grayson. Tried below before Hon-G. P. Webb. Appeal from a conviction of violating the local option law; penally» a fine of $25 and twenty days confinement in the county jail. The principal facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

HENDERSON. Judge.

Appellant was convicted of violating the local option law, and his punishment assessed at a fine of $.25 and twenty days confinement in the county jail; hence this appeal.

From the statement of facts it appears that appellant was a druggisx, and the alleged intoxicating liquor sold by him to one J. W. Brooks was labeled “kidney tonic,” or “dandelion alterative.” Witnesses state according to their recollection it was called “dandelion alterative.'’ Witness testified that it made him chunk. Appellant’s contention was, that it was a patent medicine or drug, and not a beverage,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Decker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Amber Orlean Willemsen v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2019
  2. Moreno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API