Legal Opinion

State v. Donahue

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 17, 1997No. C9502-31026; CA A90121PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals from a conviction and sentencing for first-degree sexual abuse, ORS 163.427. Defendant argues that the trial court erred in allowing a state’s witness to testify to a medical diagnosis of the victim of sexual abuse and that the trial court erred in imposing a compensatory fine. We vacate the compensatory fine and otherwise affirm.

A compensatory fine may be awarded only if the trial court finds that the victim suffered a pecuniary loss. State v. Barkley, 315 Or 420, 438, 846 P2d 390, cert den 510 US 837 (1993) ; State v. Forrester, 130 Or App 459, 462, 882 P2d 1124 (1994) .…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. BarkleyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. ForresterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. DonahueCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API