Legal Opinion

Austin v. Carpenter

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided February 17, 2009No. 2007-CA-01779-COAPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIFFIS, J., for the Court.

¶ 1. Billy G. Austin and Agnes H. Austin (the Austins) commenced a lawsuit against Thurman L. Carpenter and Gladys L. Carpenter (the Carpenters) for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property. The chancellor found that an enforceable contract never materialized because a condition precedent was not met. Applying Mississippi’s three-tiered approach to contract interpretation, we find that there was a condition precedent which applies to both parties. We find no error and affirm.

FACTS

¶ 2. In the spring of 2005, the Austins and the Carpenters…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Russell v. Performance Toyota, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2002
  2. ROYER HOMES OF MS., INC. v. Chandeleur Homes, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State Highway Com'n v. Patterson Enterprises Ltd.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Mississippi Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. Co. v. BrittMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Stampley v. GilbertMississippi Supreme Court · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Edwards Family P'ship, LP (In re Cmty. Home Fin. Servs., Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2018
  2. Enniss Family Realty I, LLC v. Schneider National Carriers, Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2013
  3. Denham Law Firm, PLLC v. David Anthony NelsonCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2017
  4. Coastal Developments, Inc. v. DedeauxCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2013
  5. Denham Law Firm, PLLC v. David Anthony NelsonCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API