Legal Opinion

People v. Barwick

California Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1936No. Crim. 4033PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDMONDS, J., pro tem.

The defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction for perjury and also from an order denying a new trial, relying principally upon the asserted error of the trial court in refusing to give him time to plead to an amended information charging a prior conviction of a felony.

The appellant pleaded not guilty to an information charging him with the crime of perjury. When the case came on for trial the district attorney presented an amended information alleging the prior conviction “of the crime of possession of a still, a felony”. Appellant asked time to file a demurrer to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McCullough v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. State v. EdelsteinWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  3. City of Sonora v. CurtinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Maria Garcia-Gonzales v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  2. Meyer v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Truchon v. ToomeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. In Re HarincarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. People v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API