Legal Opinion

Department of Fish & Game v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 2, 2011No. C066158PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HULL, J.

In this mandamus proceeding, petitioners-defendants seek to overturn a decision of the Superior Court of Plumas County certifying the underlying dispute as a class action. Real parties in interest-plaintiffs are various real property or business owners or operators and the City of Portola, all of whom are located near Lake Davis in Plumas County. (For purposes of clarity, petitioners shall be referred to as defendants and real parties in interest shall be referred to as plaintiffs.) They claim to have been harmed by efforts of the Department of Fish and Game (DFG) in 2007 to…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Palazzolo v. Rhode IslandSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Woodrow Sterling v. Velsicol Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  4. City of San Jose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Bily v. Arthur Young & Co.California Supreme Court · 1992

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Alberts v. Aurora Behavioral Health CareCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. In re ABM Indus. Overtime Cases, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  3. Apple Inc. v. Superior Court of San Diego Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. Alberts v. Aurora Behavioral Health CareCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. ABM Industries Overtime CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API