Speed v. Wilson
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Upon a rehearing of an appeal from a decree of the Danville District Gourt.
1Opinion of the Court
*81The decree on which this rehearing was granted extends to the whole of the appellee’s claim to the land in contest, and was intended to do so; but the opinion to introduce the decree only mentions the locations made on their settlement right, the court ■supposing that if the settlement failed, the pre-emption appendant on it must also fail. Indeed, when the court was making up the ■opinion, it could not find the pre-emption entry in the transcript of the record on which it was deciding, and hence also inferred that it was not much relied on. But the pre-emption entry stands in the transcript…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Phelan v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
- State v. SimasNevada Supreme Court · 1900
- Beery v. United StatesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1873
- Low v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1901
- Cooper v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.