Legal Opinion
Farrington v. Suydam
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 15, 1832PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff, after having noticed his cause for trial, was permitted to amend the declaration by changing the venue, on paying the costs of resisting the motion, and of the former plea, if a new defence was interposed.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Union Bank v. MottNew York Supreme Court · 1860
- Barstow v. RandallNew York Supreme Court · 1843