Legal Opinion

Trescott—Hart, Labatt & Co. v. Lewis

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 15, 1857PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of East Eeliciana, Satliff, J. Tried by a jury..

1Opinion of the CourtSpoeeord, J.

The case was formerly before us on a motion to quash the execution issued upon a judgment against the defendant. 11 An. 184.

Within a month after the mandate of this court was filed in the court below, William Lewis took another rule on- Hand, Labatt & Oo., transferrees of Trescott, to show cause why the seizure made under the judgment should not be released, and the writ of execution quashed, on the grounds, first, that Hart, Labatt & Go. were not owners of the judgment; secondly, that the twelve months’ bond given for the judgment had been fully paid by him; and thirdly, that the bond was…

2Cited by18 opinions

  1. Quarles v. LewisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
  2. Hope v. MadisonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  3. Scurlock Oil Company v. Getty Oil CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
  4. Himel v. ConnelySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  5. Enderlin State Bank v. JenningsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API