Legal Opinion

In Re Marshall

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1931No. Civil No. 3116PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

This is an original application for a writ of habeas corpus made to obtain bail.

Upon a complaint charging the petitioner with having murdered one Thomas K. Marshall, the petitioner was on May 27, 1931, by the Honorable EDWIN F. JONES, Justice of the Peace of Tucson precinct, Pima county, acting as a committing magistrate, given a preliminary hearing and bound over to the superior court of Pima county to answer said charge, the magistrate admitting her to bail in the sum of $20,000. On May 28th a bail bond, with two sureties, conditioned as provided by statute, was presented to the magistrate…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re HaiglerArizona Supreme Court · 1913
  2. State Ex Rel. Starritt v. NewmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Ex parte CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Carlson v. LandonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. United States Ex Rel. Heikkinen v. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
  3. Young Ex Rel. Boone v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1960
  4. Davis v. WinklerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  5. Carlson v. LandonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API