Legal Opinion

State, Department of Transportation & Development v. Oswald

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 6, 1995No. Nos. 27752-CA, 27753-CAPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

11 STEWART, Judge.

The Department of Transportation and Development brought expropriation lawsuits for two parcels of land owned by Charles Oswald and his wife. After consolidating the lawsuits, the trial court found that the Oswald properties were a business rather than an investment and that they were entitled to an amount that exceeded the fair market value of the property. DOTD was ordered to pay $358,542.44 plus legal interest and attorney’s fees. The state subsequently lodged this appeal. We reverse in part, modify in part, affirm in part, and render.

FACTS

This cause of action arose out…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State Through Dept. of Highways v. ConstantSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
  2. STATE, DOTD v. DietrichSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
  3. Southern Natural Gas Co. v. PolandLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
  4. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. AND DEV. v. HammonsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. AND DEVELOPMENT v. LobelLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Parish of Livingston v. A&M Investment Properties, LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API