Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. Brown (In Re Estate of Kay)

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 23, 2018No. Appellate Case 2016-002337; Opinion 27804PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUSTICE HEARN :

**479 This cross-appeal primarily concerns the amount of compensation owed to Petitioner/Respondent Edward Sullivan as personal representative (PR) of Marion Kay's estate. Sullivan filed a petition to settle the estate and sought probate court approval for his commissions as PR together with fees and **480 costs. In response, Respondents/Petitioners Martha Brown and Mary Moses (Brown and Moses), cousins of the deceased and two of multiple beneficiaries under the will, challenged his compensation as excessive, and the probate court agreed, reducing Sullivan's commissions,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Lewis v. LewisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  3. Layman v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  4. In Re Estate of HoldenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  5. Dean v. KilgoreCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Deborah Dereede Living Trust dated December 18, 2013 v. KarpCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2019
  2. In re Estate of ParadesesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2019
  3. Deborah Weeks v. David WeeksSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2024
  4. Dowling v. General Motors, LLCDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2019
  5. Freddie Eugene Owens v. Bryan P. StirlingSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API