Legal Opinion
Frederique v. Krapf
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 5, 2011PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
The defendants met their prima facie burden of establishing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident (see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345 [2002]; Gaddy v Eyler, 79 NY2d 955, 956-957 [1992]). The plaintiff alleged that, as a result of the subject accident, he sustained certain injuries to his left hip, the cervical and lumbosacral regions of his spine, and his left knee. However, the defendants provided competent medical evidence establishing, prima facie, that none of those alleged injuries…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Toure v. Avis Rent a Car Systems, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Gaddy v. EylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Staff v. Mair YshuaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Rodriguez v. HuerfanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Ingram v. DoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
3Cited by1 opinion
- Quintana v. Arena Transport, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011