Commonwealth v. Wilmer
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Roberts,
Appellant was tried before a judge and jury and was convicted of aggravated assault and battery, rape, and several lesser included charges. The Superior Court affirmed in an opinion by Judge Ervin, Judge Hoffman dissenting in an opinion in which Judge Spaulding joined. Commonwealth v. Wilmer, 208 Pa. Superior Ct. 102, 220 A. 2d 860 (1966). We granted allocatur.
Appellant maintains that the initial and supplemental charges of the court below were error. In the initial charge, the trial judge told the jury: “You are American citizens, and we all live under the same…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HoltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Commonwealth v. OttSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Commonwealth v. WilmerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
3Cited by18 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SullivanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. SpencerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Commonwealth v. ArchambaultSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Commonwealth v. JenningsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Commonwealth v. GoinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.