Legal Opinion

Armour Packing Co. v. Howe

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 12, 1904No. 13,498PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from Wyandotte district court; E. L. Fischer, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

.The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johkston, 0. J. :

This was an action of forcible entry and detainer, involving the possession of a part of what was an island in the Missouri river, which, by accretions, became connected with the Kansas shore-. 5. K. Howe claims to have taken possession of the land in 1889 and to have held it until December, 1895; *664when the Armour Packing Company and George W. Tourtellot unlawfully and forcibly put him off the place and entered into the possession of the same. Howe brought this proceeding in one of the city courts of Kansas City, Kan., having the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Armour Packing Co. v. HoweSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  2. Richardson v. PennySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Marley v. Wichita Transportation Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  2. Wilson v. CampbellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  3. Greiner v. GreinerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  4. Reeves v. McAdooSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
  5. Attorney General Opinion No., Kansas Attorney General Reports2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API