Andy Bailey and Barbara Bailey v. United States, Through the Department of the Army
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LEWIS R. MORGAN, Circuit Judge:
In this case the district court held that plaintiffs’ action was maintainable under the Federal Tort Claims Act,1 28 U.S.C. § 1346, because no substantial question of coverage was presented under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act (FECA),2 5 U.S.C. § 1801 et seq. We affirm.
*965Mrs. Barbara Bailey was a civilian employee of the Army Laundry at Fort Polk, Louisiana. On February 7, 1968, at 4:30 P.M., Mrs. Bailey left the laundry to go home for the day and walked to her car in the parking lot adjacent to the laundry. She entered her automobile and drove out of the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- O'Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- O'Keeffe v. Smith, Hinchman & Grylls Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. DemkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Johansen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Annunzio Somma v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- District of Columbia v. ThompsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Scott A. Taber v. Robert S. Maine, and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Charles W. Driscoll v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Ashok K. Avasthi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Harry H. Wallace and Elizabeth Snyder Wallace v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.