Legal Opinion
Armstrong v. Palmer
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided January 21, 1920No. 1569PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
This suit was brought by R.S. Palmer and E. Brooks against H. W. Armstrong and the First National Bank of Tulia to recover the sum of $1,000, agreed liquidated damages for the breach of a contract between Palmer and Armstrong for the sale of a section of land by Palmer and purchase thereof by the said Armstrong. Trial before a jury resulted in a judgment for the plaintiffs.
E. Brooks, a real estate agent at Tulia, was employed by the plaintiff Palmer to sell the section of land for a stated sum of money, which was to be paid partly in cash, partly in the assumption of certain notes…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Townshend v. GoodfellowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Tinsley v. DowellTexas Supreme Court · 1894
- Hollifield v. LandrumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903
- Hill v. ConradTexas Supreme Court · 1897
- Clifton v. CharlesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Karl Rove & Company v. Richard Thornburgh, Richard Thornburgh, Cross-Appellee, and Raymond P. Dimuzio, Defendant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- American Nat. Bank of Wichita Falls v. HaggertonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Sorsby v. ThomCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
- Martin v. DarcyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
- Pace v. OlveyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.