Legal Opinion
Heymann v. Mathes
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided November 30, 1931No. 13771PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WESTERFIELD, JJ
This case involves the question of whether attorneys’ fees may be collected by a money lender operating under the Small Loan Law (Act No. 7 of 1928 (Ex. Sess.), a question which was decided in the affirmative by this court in Automobile Sec. Corporation v. Randazza, 17 La. App. 489, 135 So. 45. Counsel for defendant admits the Randazza Case is applicable here and destructive of his position, but urges us to reconsider the question upon the ground of its public importance. The writer of this opinion was not in accord with the views expressed in the Randazza Case and felt so…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Automobile Security Corp. v. RandazzaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
3Cited by7 opinions
- Foundation Finance Co. v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
- Knighten v. American Automobile Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1960
- Unity Plan Finance Co. v. GreenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
- Foundation Finance Co. v. RobbinsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
- General American Finance System, Inc. v. SenseneyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.