Legal Opinion

United States v. Richard Steelhammer, United States of America v. Andrew Gallagher

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided August 31, 1977No. 75-2178, 75-2179PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Per curiam

A panel of the court decided this case by a split vote. United States v. Steelhammer, 539 F.2d 373 (4 Cir. 1976). The majority opinion was written by Judge Bryan and concurred in by Judge Kunzig of the United States Court of Claims who was sitting by designation. Judge Winter dissented and filed a separate statement of his views.

We granted rehearing in banc to determine whether, under the facts and circumstances set forth in the panel opinions, the reporters could properly be held in contempt of court for their refusal to testify. On this issue, Chief Judge Haynsworth, Judge Winter, Judge…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. Richard Steelhammer, United States of America v. Andrew GallagherCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Marks v. VehlowIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  2. In Re Andrew Shain Sid Gaulden Cindi Ross Scoppe Schuyler Kropf, United States of America v. Jefferson Marion Long, Jr., A/K/A "Bud" LongCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  3. In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. James Richard Scarce, Witness-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. Jeffrey SterlingCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
  5. State v. TurnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API