Legal Opinion

Lloyd v. Weinstock

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 16, 1926PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiam.

This action was brought by the plaintiff to recover the amount of a deposit of,$1,000 made by him on account of the purchase-money of property which he had contracted to buy from the defendant. The trial resulted in the direction of a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for the amount of his deposit, with interest, and the defendant has appealed. The principal contention is that the direction of a verdict was improper.

An examination of the state of the case discloses the following situation: The defendant, Weinstock, desired to sell a piece of property located on Hawthorne avenue, in…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. BeneventoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1945
  2. Benedict v. NielsenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API