Lloyd v. Weinstock
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Cueiam.
This action was brought by the plaintiff to recover the amount of a deposit of,$1,000 made by him on account of the purchase-money of property which he had contracted to buy from the defendant. The trial resulted in the direction of a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for the amount of his deposit, with interest, and the defendant has appealed. The principal contention is that the direction of a verdict was improper.
An examination of the state of the case discloses the following situation: The defendant, Weinstock, desired to sell a piece of property located on Hawthorne avenue, in…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. BeneventoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1945
- Benedict v. NielsenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927