Legal Opinion
Ledoux v. City of Baton Rouge/Parish of East Baton Rouge
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided June 25, 1999No. 98 CA 0683PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
J^FITZSIMMONS, J.
This appeal revolves around the issue of prescription as it applies to a claim for accumulated compensatory time, or leave. *295The trial court denied the peremptory exception of prescription filed on behalf of City of Baton Rouge/Parish of East Baton Rouge and the Greater Baton Rouge Airport District. We reverse for the following reasons.
FACTS
On July 17, 1995, Iray Ledoux filed a petition against the City of Baton Rouge/Parish of East Baton Rouge and the Greater Baton Rouge Airport District (City-Parish). He claimed entitlement to accumulated compensatory leave, which had been…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Knecht v. Bd. of Trustees for State Col.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
- Montiville v. City of WestwegoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
- Jones v. City Parish of East Baton RougeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1988
- Wonycott v. Southern Business MacHinesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
- Southerland v. Board of TrusteesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ledoux v. City of Baton Rouge/Parish of East Baton RougeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000