Legal Opinion
Kladivo v. Hospodarsky
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided May 4, 1920PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Appeal from Johnson District Court. — K. G-. Popham, Judge. This is an appeal .because a motion to discharge the property seized under a landlord’s attachment was overruled.
1Opinion of the CourtSaliNGER, J.
"1. Landlobd and I. The petition upon which the attachment was issued makes claim on notes confessedly due for rent. It adds a distinct claim for money loaned in a stated sum. The motion to discharge asks:
“That said attachment be dissolved, set erty attached 'he released from said attachment, and all costs incurred thereunder be taxed to the plaintiff.”
The basis of the motion is the claim that the petition shows on its face that: '
“The indebtedness sued on is not for rent of the premises described in the petition alone, but includes other items of indebtedness, so blended that it is…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mitchell v. BeckSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
- Merrit v. FisherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
- Sloanaker v. HowertonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
- Ladner v. BalsleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
- Woodbine Savings Bank v. TylerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. SchweitzerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
- Bervid v. Iowa State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
- Nairn v. Farmers National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
- Skaien v. Witwer Grocer Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1937
- State v. SchweitzerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969