Legal Opinion

Terry Haggerty Tire Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 7, 1989No. 710-87TPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MARGOLIS, Judge.

This tax case by Terry Haggerty Tire Co., Inc., was brought for the recovery of partially paid excise taxes. Plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment alleging that it is not an “importer” of tires liable for excise taxes. Defendant filed a cross-motion for summary judgment contending that plaintiff is an “importer” under section 4071 of the Internal Revenue Code. After a careful review of the entire record, and after hearing oral argument, the defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment is granted, and plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is denied.

FACTS

Plainti…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bogardus v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. United States v. MichelSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Handley Motor Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  4. Import Wholesalers Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Terry Haggerty Tire Co., Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  2. Terry Haggerty Tire Co., Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  3. Texas Truck Parts & Tire v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API