Legal Opinion

Brewster v. Hardeman

Oglethorpe County Superior Court, Ga.

Decided October 15, 1830Published

Assumpsit, and plea of Statute of Limitations (a).

1Opinion of the Court

*138The facts in this case are admitted by the parties to be as f0]]0WS< On the 14th day of October, in the year 1822, John Hardeman, the active partner oí tne nrm oí John Hardeman & Co. (wbich was composed of John Hardeman, Thomas N. Poullain, end Philip Wray,) addressed an order in the name of the firm, to the plaintiffs io New York, for a certain nuro-ber of hats, which were forwarded pursuant to order. The plaintiffs, confiding in the solvency of the firm, were in no *139baste to push their demand, but after some time placed the account in the hands of their agents, Brewster & Prescott of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bell v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  2. Smith v. LudlowNew York Supreme Court · 1810
  3. Johnson v. BeardsleeNew York Supreme Court · 1818
  4. Bound v. LathropSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1822
  5. Rootes v. Wellford & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1814

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API