Dibble v. Hanson
North Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Stark county; Winchester, J. Action by F. D. Dibble against G. B. Flanson. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion
ON REHEARING.
■ Since the foregoing opinion was rendered counsel for appellant have filed a petition for rehearing, in which they contend that the well-established rule that an order for judgment is non-appeal-able has no application in the case at bar, for the reason, as stated, that a judgment had previously been entered in plaintiff’s favor, and hence the order appealed from is an order made after judgment and is appealable. Counsel’s contention, no doubt, would be sound if their premise was correct; but, as we view it, the fallacy of their argument consists in the erroneous assumption that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stearus v. AguirreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
- Willson v. CleavelandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Kelly v. Van AustinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- Dibble v. HansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
- Oliphant v. WhitneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.