King v. Interstate Consolidated R.R. Co.
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Trespass on the case for negligence on facts set forth in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtTillinghast, J.
These cases, which are substantially alike, are before us on demurrers to the declarations. We will consider the first-named case. It is trespass on the case for negligence, and sets out in substance, in the first count thereof, that the plaintiff was employed by the defendant corporation to help remove snow from its railroad tracks between Pawtucket, R. I., and Attleboro, Mass., in very cold weather in the month of February, 1899 ; that the work had to be done over a wide tract of open country, remote from dwelling-houses and other- habitations ; that the defendant knew that the work of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Nickerson v. Bridgeport Hydraulic Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1878
- Schumaker v. St. Paul & Duluth RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Hyatt v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885
- Clifford v. Denver, South Park & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Colorado · 1886
3Cited by1 opinion
- Warshauer v. Lloyd Sabaudo S. A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934